The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
Identifieur interne : 000623 ( Istex/Curation ); précédent : 000622; suivant : 000624The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
Auteurs : A. Pace-Balzan ; J. I. Cawood ; R. Howell ; D. Lowe ; S. N. Rogers [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- Journal of Oral Rehabilitation [ 0305-182X ] ; 2004-06.
Descripteurs français
- Wicri :
- topic : Organisation européenne, Vie sociale.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adjuvant radiotherapy, Aintree trust, Arch otolaryngol head neck surg, Blackwell publishing, British association, Cancer groups, Cancer patients, Clinical function, Consecutive patients, Conventional dentures, Denture, Denture domain, Endosteal implants, Eortc, European organisation, Experience problems, Facial, Facial appearance, Family eortc, Food particles, Full implant insertion, Full range, Good agreement, Head neck, Hrqol, Internal consistency, Likert scale, Liquids eortc, Liverpool, Lorq, Lower denture, Lower denture cause soreness, Lower dentures, Median correlation, Mouth dryness, Neck cancer, Neck cancer patients, Neck questionnaire version, Neck questionnaires, Oral cancer, Oral disorders, Oral function, Oral health impact community dent health, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral oncol, Oral rehabilitation, Oral rehabilitation clinic, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table, Oral rehabilitation team, Oropharyngeal cancer, Other people, Other questionnaires, Past week, Patient groups, Pilot study, Possible responses, Primary surgery, Pureed food eortc, Questions deal, Radiotherapy, Regional maxillofacial unit, Rehabilitation questionnaire, Small sample size, Social life, Solid food eortc, Tooth loss, University hospital aintree, Upper denture, Upper denture cause soreness, Uwqol, Washington head.
- Teeft :
- Adjuvant radiotherapy, Aintree trust, Arch otolaryngol head neck surg, Blackwell publishing, British association, Cancer groups, Cancer patients, Clinical function, Consecutive patients, Conventional dentures, Denture, Denture domain, Endosteal implants, Eortc, European organisation, Experience problems, Facial, Facial appearance, Family eortc, Food particles, Full implant insertion, Full range, Good agreement, Head neck, Hrqol, Internal consistency, Likert scale, Liquids eortc, Liverpool, Lorq, Lower denture, Lower denture cause soreness, Lower dentures, Median correlation, Mouth dryness, Neck cancer, Neck cancer patients, Neck questionnaire version, Neck questionnaires, Oral cancer, Oral disorders, Oral function, Oral health impact community dent health, Oral maxillofac surg, Oral oncol, Oral rehabilitation, Oral rehabilitation clinic, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire, Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table, Oral rehabilitation team, Oropharyngeal cancer, Other people, Other questionnaires, Past week, Patient groups, Pilot study, Possible responses, Primary surgery, Pureed food eortc, Questions deal, Radiotherapy, Regional maxillofacial unit, Rehabilitation questionnaire, Small sample size, Social life, Solid food eortc, Tooth loss, University hospital aintree, Upper denture, Upper denture cause soreness, Uwqol, Washington head.
Abstract
summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000623
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CBCuration
No country items
A. Pace-Balzan<affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Cheshire</wicri:noCountry></affiliation>Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Pace Alzan, A" sort="Pace Alzan, A" uniqKey="Pace Alzan A" first="A." last="Pace-Balzan">A. Pace-Balzan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cawood, J I" sort="Cawood, J I" uniqKey="Cawood J" first="J. I." last="Cawood">J. I. Cawood</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howell, R" sort="Howell, R" uniqKey="Howell R" first="R." last="Howell">R. Howell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lowe, D" sort="Lowe, D" uniqKey="Lowe D" first="D." last="Lowe">D. Lowe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Cheshire</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, S N" sort="Rogers, S N" uniqKey="Rogers S" first="S. N." last="Rogers">S. N. Rogers</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB</idno><date when="2004" year="2004">2004</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01279.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000623</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000623</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000623</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main">The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Pace Alzan, A" sort="Pace Alzan, A" uniqKey="Pace Alzan A" first="A." last="Pace-Balzan">A. Pace-Balzan</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Cawood, J I" sort="Cawood, J I" uniqKey="Cawood J" first="J. I." last="Cawood">J. I. Cawood</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Oral and Maxillofacial Department, Countess of Chester Hospital, Chester</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Chester</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Howell, R" sort="Howell, R" uniqKey="Howell R" first="R." last="Howell">R. Howell</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Restorative Dentistry, Liverpool University Dental Hospital, Pembroke Place, Liverpool</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Liverpool</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Lowe, D" sort="Lowe, D" uniqKey="Lowe D" first="D." last="Lowe">D. Lowe</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Medical Statistician, Mossley, Cheshire</mods:affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">Cheshire</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rogers, S N" sort="Rogers, S N" uniqKey="Rogers S" first="S. N." last="Rogers">S. N. Rogers</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><mods:affiliation>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool, UK</mods:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Aintree Trust, Liverpool</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of Oral Rehabilitation</title><title level="j" type="alt">JOURNAL ORAL REHABILITATION</title><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1365-2842</idno><imprint><biblScope unit="vol">31</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="609">609</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="617">617</biblScope><biblScope unit="page-count">9</biblScope><publisher>Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2004-06">2004-06</date></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0305-182X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjuvant radiotherapy</term><term>Aintree trust</term><term>Arch otolaryngol head neck surg</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>British association</term><term>Cancer groups</term><term>Cancer patients</term><term>Clinical function</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture domain</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>Eortc</term><term>European organisation</term><term>Experience problems</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Family eortc</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full implant insertion</term><term>Full range</term><term>Good agreement</term><term>Head neck</term><term>Hrqol</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Liquids eortc</term><term>Liverpool</term><term>Lorq</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture cause soreness</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Median correlation</term><term>Mouth dryness</term><term>Neck cancer</term><term>Neck cancer patients</term><term>Neck questionnaire version</term><term>Neck questionnaires</term><term>Oral cancer</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health impact community dent health</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral oncol</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral rehabilitation clinic</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table</term><term>Oral rehabilitation team</term><term>Oropharyngeal cancer</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other questionnaires</term><term>Past week</term><term>Patient groups</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Possible responses</term><term>Primary surgery</term><term>Pureed food eortc</term><term>Questions deal</term><term>Radiotherapy</term><term>Regional maxillofacial unit</term><term>Rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Small sample size</term><term>Social life</term><term>Solid food eortc</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>University hospital aintree</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper denture cause soreness</term><term>Uwqol</term><term>Washington head</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adjuvant radiotherapy</term><term>Aintree trust</term><term>Arch otolaryngol head neck surg</term><term>Blackwell publishing</term><term>British association</term><term>Cancer groups</term><term>Cancer patients</term><term>Clinical function</term><term>Consecutive patients</term><term>Conventional dentures</term><term>Denture</term><term>Denture domain</term><term>Endosteal implants</term><term>Eortc</term><term>European organisation</term><term>Experience problems</term><term>Facial</term><term>Facial appearance</term><term>Family eortc</term><term>Food particles</term><term>Full implant insertion</term><term>Full range</term><term>Good agreement</term><term>Head neck</term><term>Hrqol</term><term>Internal consistency</term><term>Likert scale</term><term>Liquids eortc</term><term>Liverpool</term><term>Lorq</term><term>Lower denture</term><term>Lower denture cause soreness</term><term>Lower dentures</term><term>Median correlation</term><term>Mouth dryness</term><term>Neck cancer</term><term>Neck cancer patients</term><term>Neck questionnaire version</term><term>Neck questionnaires</term><term>Oral cancer</term><term>Oral disorders</term><term>Oral function</term><term>Oral health impact community dent health</term><term>Oral maxillofac surg</term><term>Oral oncol</term><term>Oral rehabilitation</term><term>Oral rehabilitation clinic</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Oral rehabilitation questionnaire table</term><term>Oral rehabilitation team</term><term>Oropharyngeal cancer</term><term>Other people</term><term>Other questionnaires</term><term>Past week</term><term>Patient groups</term><term>Pilot study</term><term>Possible responses</term><term>Primary surgery</term><term>Pureed food eortc</term><term>Questions deal</term><term>Radiotherapy</term><term>Regional maxillofacial unit</term><term>Rehabilitation questionnaire</term><term>Small sample size</term><term>Social life</term><term>Solid food eortc</term><term>Tooth loss</term><term>University hospital aintree</term><term>Upper denture</term><term>Upper denture cause soreness</term><term>Uwqol</term><term>Washington head</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="topic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Organisation européenne</term><term>Vie sociale</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">summary There are several validated health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires designed to record patient‐derived outcomes in head and neck cancer. None deals specifically with oral rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to pilot a new questionnaire, the Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire (LORQ). The questionnaire consists of 25 items about oral function and denture satisfaction. A four‐point Likert scale is used. Sixty‐one consecutive patients attending oral rehabilitation clinics completed the LORQ in combination with the University of Washington Head and Neck questionnaire version 3 (UW‐QOL) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer H&N quality of life questionnaire (EORTC H&N 35). Forty‐two patients received questionnaires at baseline, whereas the rest were provided with the questionnaires at various stages of oral rehabilitation. For each item on the questionnaire, a full range of possible responses were given by patients. Kappa coefficients of agreement for test–retest data indicated moderate to very good agreement between repeat questionnaires. There were significant correlations (P < 0·001) between items in the LORQ and those in the UW‐QOL and EORTC HN questionnaires. The LORQ also identified differences in responses between non‐cancer and cancer groups of patients undergoing oral rehabilitation. This study of the LORQ is encouraging, although data on its responsiveness over time and to intervention is awaited.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Istex/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000623 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000623 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:0CF79BA26C8FD962C30365915F4A00224F8552CB
|texte= The Liverpool Oral Rehabilitation Questionnaire: a pilot study
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |